If the New York Times report is true, the Mary Peltola marketing campaign did something dumb and pointless, but not unlawful. The two Dan Sullivans poll controversy and the function the Peltola marketing campaign might have performed in recruiting a second Dan Sullivan were breathlessly handled by elites like the Times and the White House as a main scandal.

The downside is that the two candidates with the same trick is an historic trick that is used in every single election cycle.

PoliticusUSA is 100% unbiased information and opinion. We are reader-supported, so please support us by changing into a subscriber.

In reality, Republicans are utilizing it themselves in 2026.

There is a left-wing candidate in Nevada named Danielle Ford, who occurs to also be working for governor in Nevada, and coincidentally shares the same identify as the Democratic nominee.

Republicans have been attempting to confuse voters in Nevada into voting for the other Danielle Ford.

However, the DOJ has not yet opened an investigation into this case.

In my view, it is a low-brow factor to do, but it isn’t unlawful.

The US Attorney for Alaska held a press convention on Friday to talk about the legal probe into the two Dan Sullivans and the Alaska Senate election lawsuit.

It was a complete faceplant.